The Times Wants You Consumed by Fear, Isolation, and Misery

There are probably multiple reasons why coronavirus cases in the US are down nearly 50% in the US in the last month. 

  • Jeffrey A. Tucker 

Could be seasonal. Could be the vaccine. Could be herd immunity from natural infection. 

Could be the post-holiday default to endemicity. Could be a change in the cycle threshold of PCR that generates fewer positive cases. Could be data tweaks in light of political changes.  

Anyone who says he knows for sure which is dominant is pretending to know the unknowable. 

The New York Times, which obliquely reports the case decline, is still certain that you should still live in isolation, fear, and disease panic. They offer every county in America a tool in which you can discover what you should do to protect yourself from the pathogen, as if the only way to deal with a respiratory virus is to hide. Their tool is extremely manipulative. 

For example, they have this category called “very high risk level.” Red is in the text. Scary! But what is it? It means 11 or more people per 100,000 have generated a positive PCR test for the coronavirus. 

Not deaths. Not hospitalizations. Not even symptomatically sick. (Yes, I know the term “sick” is old fashioned.) 

We are talking about 11 positive PCR tests. This is an infection rate of 0.01%. Consider too that the NYT reports that these tests in the past have generated up to 90% false positives. In addition, the infection fatality ratio for those under 70 could be as low as 0.03%. …

https://www.aier.org/article/the-times-wants-you-consumed-by-fear-isolation-and-misery/

#CoronaCoup#CoronaDiktatur

#GreatReset

This entry was posted in Bürgerbewegung, Freiheit, Gesundheit, Politik, Propaganda, Wissenschaft and tagged . Bookmark the permalink.

Leave a Reply